Animals that see ultraviolet light
Humans cannot see ultraviolet: our shortest-wavelength cone peaks near 420 nm, and the lens of the adult eye absorbs most UV before it reaches the retina. Many animals can. In our catalogue, 16 of 46 species have a light receptor that peaks in the ultraviolet, below 400 nm — insects, fish, a mantis shrimp, a mouse, a bat, reptiles, a spider and a hummingbird among them.
Animals with an ultraviolet receptor
| Animal | Shortest receptor peak | All receptor peaks |
|---|---|---|
| Mantis shrimp | 315 nm | 315 / 500 / 700 nm |
| Honeybee | 344 nm | 344 / 436 / 544 nm |
| Housefly | 345 nm | 345 / 435 / 490 nm |
| Moth | 350 nm | 350 / 440 / 525 nm |
| Dragonfly | 350 nm | 350 / 440 / 520 / 620 nm |
| Goldfish | 356 nm | 356 / 447 / 537 / 620 nm |
| Mouse | 360 nm | 360 / 508 nm |
| Butterfly | 360 nm | 360 / 440 / 530 / 610 nm |
| Jumping spider | 360 nm | 360 / 530 nm |
| Zebrafish | 362 nm | 362 / 415 / 480 / 570 nm |
| Gecko | 364 nm | 364 / 467 / 521 nm |
| Bat | 365 nm | 365 / 550 nm |
| Hummingbird | 370 nm | 370 / 450 / 510 / 560 nm |
| Chameleon | 375 nm | 375 / 450 / 505 / 565 nm |
| Common carp | 377.5 nm | 377.5 / 458 / 532 / 600 nm |
| Clownfish | 386 nm | 386 / 497 / 535 nm |
What ultraviolet shows them
Bees and flowers
The honeybee's receptors peak near 344, 436, 544 nm: ultraviolet, blue and green, with nothing tuned to red. Its colour world is shifted towards short wavelengths compared with ours. Many flowers carry ultraviolet patterns — nectar guides — invisible to us but plain to a bee, and a mix of ultraviolet and yellow gives bees a colour we have no name for, often called "bee purple". Red, by contrast, looks dark to a bee.
Mice and other small mammals
The mouse's short-wavelength cone peaks near 360 nm, in the ultraviolet, alongside a second cone near 508 nm, in a retina dominated by rods. Among the mammals in our catalogue, only the mouse and the bat carry a receptor tuned that far into the ultraviolet; dogs, cats, horses and most others have their shortest cone in the blue or violet instead.
Reindeer and the Arctic winter
Reindeer are an unusual case: their cones are not ultraviolet cones, but their eyes let ultraviolet through and their retina responds to it. In the Arctic, where snow reflects ultraviolet strongly, that makes lichen — the reindeer's winter food — and the fur of predators stand out as dark against bright snow. It is why the reindeer appears here as a special case rather than in the table above.
Birds: violet rather than ultraviolet
Birds have four cone types and are often described as seeing ultraviolet. Many do, the hummingbird in the table above among them, but a large group — including the birds of prey in our catalogue — are violet-sensitive instead, with a shortest cone between 400 and 430 nm. In our catalogue that group is: eagle, pigeon, chicken, duck, penguin and Indian peafowl. Their colour space still reaches further towards short wavelengths than ours, and coloured oil droplets on their cones sharpen how finely they separate hues.
Sources
- Baier & Scott (2024), Annu Rev Neurosci 47:255–276
- Bowmaker & Martin (1985)
- Bowmaker (1998)
- Bowmaker et al. (1997)
- Bowmaker, Loew & Ott (2005)
- Chen, Awata & Arikawa (2016)
- Coimbra et al. (2012)
- Connaughton & Nelson (2010), J Neurophysiol 104:2906–2921
- Cronin & Marshall (1989)
- De Souza et al. (2019), PLoS ONE 14:e0215880, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215880
- Doyle et al. (2014)
- Emmerton & Delius (1980)
- Futahashi et al. (2015)
- Hahmann & Güntürkün (1993)
- Hardie (1985)
- Hart (2001)
- Hart (2002), J Exp Biol 205:3925–3935, doi:10.1242/jeb.205.24.3925
- Hawryshyn & Harosi (1991), Vision Res 31:567–576, doi:10.1016/0042-6989(91)90107-G
- Herrera et al. (2008)
- Hogg et al. (2011)
- Jacobs & Williams (2007)
- Jacobs, Neitz & Deegan (1991)
- Jane & Bowmaker (1988)
- Kaneko & Tachibana (1985), Jpn J Physiol 35:355–365, doi:10.2170/jjphysiol.35.355
- Kelber, Balkenius & Warrant (2002)
- Koshitaka et al. (2008)
- Labhart & Nilsson (1995)
- Land & Eckert (1985)
- Land (1969)
- Land (1997)
- Lind, Mitkus, Olsson & Kelber (2013)
- Lisney et al. (2015)
- Marshall & Land (1993)
- Martin (1999)
- Menzel & Backhaus (1991)
- Mitchell et al. (2024)
- Müller et al. (2009)
- Neumeyer (1992)
- Neumeyer (2003)
- Osorio, Vorobyev & Jones (1999)
- Ott & Schaeffel (1995)
- Peitsch et al. (1992)
- Pita et al. (2015), PeerJ 3:e1113
- Prusky, West & Douglas (2000)
- Reymond (1985)
- Robinson et al. (1993), PNAS 90:6009–6012
- Roth & Kelber (2004)
- Roth, Lundström, Kelber et al. (2009)
- Sato et al. (2025), Sci Rep 15:11651
- Siebeck et al. (2010)
- Srinivasan & Lehrer (1988)
- Stieb et al. (2019)
- Stoddard et al. (2020)
- Stokkan et al. (2013)
- Stöckl, O'Carroll & Warrant (2017)
- Tappeiner et al. (2012), Front Zool 9:10
- Thoen, How, Chiou & Marshall (2014)
- Warrant (2017)
- Winter, López & von Helversen (2003)
- Yorzinski et al. (2015), J Exp Biol 218:3771–3776, doi:10.1242/jeb.129544
- Yoshimatsu et al. (2020), Neuron 107:320–337.e6
- Zaunreiter, Junger & Kotrschal (1991), Vision Res 31:383–394, doi:10.1016/0042-6989(91)90091-I
- Zurek et al. (2015)
See it through their eyes
Animal Vision applies these same vision models to your phone camera in real time.
© 2026 Animal Vision · animalvision.app